Is Your AI Governance Ready?
- Glen Thomas

- 4 days ago
- 3 min read
Lessons from cybersecurity's early days

“If cybersecurity protects systems, AI governance protects decisions.” NovelVista
Artificial intelligence is accelerating faster than any technology we've seen in decades. Agentic systems, automated decision-making, and generative models are rapidly reshaping how organizations operate, compete and deliver value.
Yet, as AI adoption grows, many organizations are repeating the same patterns we saw in the early days of cybersecurity: rapid experimentation, inconsistent controls, shadow tools, unclear accountability, and delayed executive oversight.
The companies that moved early on cybersecurity governance became safer, more trusted, and better positioned to innovate. The same is now true for AI.
The Parallels: Why AI Feels Like Cybersecurity All Over Again
When cybersecurity first emerged as a strategic priority, organizations struggled to answer basic questions: Who owns the risk? What controls are needed? How do we balance safety with agility?
AI is following the same trajectory:
Business units are driving adoption faster than governance can keep up.
Shadow AI and unmonitored experiments are proliferating.
Many leaders assume AI systems are "just tools" rather than risk-bearing assets.
Boards want assurance - but aren't getting clear, consistent reporting.
The lesson from cybersecurity is clear: governance must mature before incidents force the issue.
Why AI Governance Matters Now
It reduces risk - before it becomes a problem
AI introduces new types of organizational risk: biased decisions, model drift, hallucinations, data leakage, prompt injection, and misuse of agentic systems. Early governance sets guardrails that minimise the likelihood and impact of incidents. Cybersecurity showed us the cost of reactive governance. AI offers the chance to get ahead of the curve.
Regulation is coming fast
The EU AI Act, emerging GCC frameworks, and global standards are reshaping expectations. Organizations that prepare now will avoid the last-minute - potentially costly - compliance scramble that defined early cybersecurity regulation.
Trust depends on governance
Leaders want to use AI for forecasting, operations, customer service and strategic decision-making. But, without controls for accuracy, explainability and oversight, trust quickly erodes. Governance creates the confidence needed for meaningful adoption.
Governance Enables Innovation - Not Restricts It
When cybersecurity governance matured, it didn't slow digital transformation, it accelerated it. Cloud platforms, mobile applications, and online services only scaled once secure foundations were in place.
The same holds true for AI:
Clear rules let teams innovate without fear.
Standardized processes elimate guesswork.
Guardrails prevent costly rework and uncontrolled sprawl.
Safe experimentation becomes easier - not harder.
What Cybersecurity Teaches Us About Getting AI Governance Right From The Start
Central ownership with collaborative execution
Effective programs sit within a defined function (risk, digital, or enterprise governance) but rely on close collaborative partnerships with IT, legal, HR, operations and other business units.
Focus on high-risk use cases first
Cybersecurity evolved from "secure everything" to risk-based prioritization. AI governance must adopt the same approach.
Continuous monitoring is essential
Models drift, prompts evolve, and threats change. Governance cannot be a one-off. It requires lifecycle oversight, model assurance, and incident response playbooks.
Culture and training matter
Cybersecurity became part of organizational culture only when people understood their role. AI governance needs the same cultural investment: training, awareness, and accessible guidance.
The Executive Imperative
Boards and C-Suite leadership teams are rapidly elevating AI to a strategic agenda item. They want to ensure:
AI investments align with risk appetite
Shadow AI is reduced
Regulatory compliance is met
Ethical and operational risks are managed
AI contributes to performance, not instability.
AI governance provides the frameworks, controls, and reporting needed to deliver that assurance.
Where Organizations Should Start
Define ownership and governance structure
Build or adopt policies, standards, and a risk taxonomy
Assess current AI use cases - especially high-risk or high-impact ones
Implement model lifecycle governance (MLOps + assurance)
Establish monitoring, reporting, and escalation processes
Invest in staff capability and awareness
Starting small, focused and practical is more effective than attempting a sweeping, enterprise-wide program from day one.
Conclusion: Trusted AI Requires Governance
AI will continue to transform industries, but only organizations with clear governance will realize its full value. The lessons from cybersecurity are unmistakeable: early adopters of governance gain trust, avoid unnecessary risk, and innovate faster.
The question for leaders is no longer "Should we adopt AI governance?" It's "Are we adopting it fast enough?"
Ready to move from AI experimentation to trusted, enterprise-grade adoption?
Engage with us to assess your AI governance maturity and design the practical controls, policies, and assurance mechanisms your organisation needs to move forward with confidence.



Comments